RPA Testing: A Must-Have, Not a Nice-To-Have
I just dug into rpa testing, and it really cleared up why testing is so crucial for automation projects. Too many teams launch bots thinking they’re “set and forget,” but without proper RPA testing, you end up with flaky automations that fail in production. The guide breaks down strategies for validating workflows, handling exceptions, and ensuring bots behave as expected — exactly what I needed for my last rollout. Now our automations are more reliable, and our users trust them instead of fearing them. Highly recommend that teams formalise RPA testing early, not after problems start popping up.
Comments
-
Totally agree. RPA testing is often underestimated, but without it bots quickly become unreliable. Validating workflows and exception handling early saves a lot of production headaches later.
0 -
Great point. Treating bots as “set and forget” is risky. Formal RPA testing early builds trust, stability, and confidence in automation outcomes across the business.
0
Resources
Welcome! Check out our Community Code of Conduct. (review here)